Root spell revision

Optional SQL

changelog.txt

@@ -1,5 +1,14 @@
 EQEMu Changelog (Started on Sept 24, 2003 15:50)
 -------------------------------------------------------
+== 03/04/2014 ==
+Kayen: Revision to root code to be consistent with live based on extensive personal parsing.
+*ROOT has a 40% chance to do a resist check to break each buff tick.
+*If multiple roots on target. Root in first slot will always and only be check to break from nukes.
+*If multiple roots on target and broken by spell. Roots are removed ONE at a time in order of buff slot.
+*Roots on beneficial spells can not be broken by spell damage.
+
+Optional SQL: utils/sql/git/optional/2014_03_04_RootRule.sql
+
 == 03/03/2014 ==
 demonstar55: Implemented deadly strikes and gave rogues higher innate throwing crit chance
 

common/ruletypes.h

@@ -300,6 +300,7 @@ RULE_INT ( Spells, DivineInterventionHeal, 8000) //Divine intervention heal amou
 RULE_BOOL ( Spells, AdditiveBonusValues, false) //Allow certain bonuses to be calculated by adding together the value from each item, instead of taking the highest value. (ie Add together all Cleave Effects)
 RULE_BOOL ( Spells, UseCHAScribeHack, false) //ScribeSpells and TrainDiscs quest functions will ignore entries where field 12 is CHA.  What's the best way to do this?
 RULE_BOOL ( Spells, BuffLevelRestrictions, true) //Buffs will not land on low level toons like live
+RULE_INT ( Spells, RootBreakCheckChance, 40) //Determines chance for a root break check to occur each buff tick.
 RULE_CATEGORY_END()
 
 RULE_CATEGORY( Combat )

common/spdat.cpp

@@ -390,8 +390,7 @@ bool IsPartialCapableSpell(uint16 spell_id)
 	if (spells[spell_id].no_partial_resist)
 		return false;
 	
-	if (IsPureNukeSpell(spell_id) || IsFearSpell(spell_id) ||
+	if (IsPureNukeSpell(spell_id) || IsFearSpell(spell_id))
-			IsEffectInSpell(spell_id, SE_Root))
 		return true;
 
 	return false;

zone/attack.cpp

@@ -3685,29 +3685,8 @@ void Mob::CommonDamage(Mob* attacker, int32 &damage, const uint16 spell_id, cons
 
 		if(spell_id != SPELL_UNKNOWN && !iBuffTic) {
 			//see if root will break
-			if (IsRooted() && !FromDamageShield) { // neotoyko: only spells cancel root
+			if (IsRooted() && !FromDamageShield)  // neotoyko: only spells cancel root
-
+				TryRootFadeByDamage(buffslot);
-				/*Dev Quote 2010: http://forums.station.sony.com/eq/posts/list.m?topic_id=161443
-				The Viscid Roots AA does the following: Reduces the chance for root to break by X percent.
-				There is no distinction of any kind between the caster inflicted damage, or anyone
-				else's damage. There is also no distinction between Direct and DOT damage in the root code.
-				There is however, a provision that if the damage inflicted is greater than 500 per hit, the
-				chance to break root is increased. My guess is when this code was put in place, the devs at
-				the time couldn't imagine DOT damage getting that high.
-				*/
-				int BreakChance = RuleI(Spells, RootBreakFromSpells);
-				BreakChance -= BreakChance*rooted_mod/100;
-
-				if (BreakChance < 1)
-					BreakChance = 1;
-
-				if (MakeRandomInt(0, 99) < BreakChance) {
-					mlog(COMBAT__HITS, "Spell broke root! BreakChance percent chance");
-					BuffFadeByEffect(SE_Root, buffslot); // buff slot is passed through so a root w/ dam doesnt cancel itself
-				} else {
-					mlog(COMBAT__HITS, "Spell did not break root. BreakChance percent chance");
-				}
-			}
 		}
 		else if(spell_id == SPELL_UNKNOWN)
 		{
@@ -4575,6 +4554,50 @@ void Mob::TrySkillProc(Mob *on, uint16 skill, float chance)
 	}
 }
 
+bool Mob::TryRootFadeByDamage(int buffslot)
+{
+	/*Dev Quote 2010: http://forums.station.sony.com/eq/posts/list.m?topic_id=161443
+	The Viscid Roots AA does the following: Reduces the chance for root to break by X percent.
+	There is no distinction of any kind between the caster inflicted damage, or anyone
+	else's damage. There is also no distinction between Direct and DOT damage in the root code.
+	There is however, a provision that if the damage inflicted is greater than 500 per hit, the
+	chance to break root is increased. My guess is when this code was put in place, the devs at
+	the time couldn't imagine DOT damage getting that high.
+	*/
+	
+	int BreakChance = RuleI(Spells, RootBreakFromSpells);
+	
+	BreakChance -= BreakChance*rooted_mod/100;
+
+	if (BreakChance < 1)
+		BreakChance = 1;
+
+	if (MakeRandomInt(0, 99) < BreakChance) {
+
+		/*
+		- Check buffslot to make sure damage from a root does not cancel the root
+		- If multiple roots on target, always and only checks first root slot and if broken only removes that slots root. 
+		- Only roots on determental spells can be broken by damage.
+		*/
+
+		uint32 buff_count = GetMaxTotalSlots();
+		for(int i = 0; i < buff_count; i++)
+		{
+			if(IsValidSpell(buffs[i].spellid) && 
+				(IsEffectInSpell(buffs[i].spellid, SE_Root) && IsDetrimentalSpell(buffs[i].spellid) && i != buffslot)){
+				if (!TryFadeEffect(i)) {
+					BuffFadeBySlot(i);
+					mlog(COMBAT__HITS, "Spell broke root! BreakChance percent chance");
+					return true;
+				}
+			}
+		}
+	}
+
+	mlog(COMBAT__HITS, "Spell did not break root. BreakChance percent chance");
+	return false;
+}
+
 int32 Mob::RuneAbsorb(int32 damage, uint16 type)
 {
 	uint32 buff_max = GetMaxTotalSlots();

zone/mob.h

@@ -600,6 +600,7 @@ public:
 	void MeleeLifeTap(int32 damage);
 	bool PassCastRestriction(bool UseCastRestriction = true, int16 value = 0, bool IsDamage = true);
 	bool ImprovedTaunt();
+	bool TryRootFadeByDamage(int buffslot);
 
 	void ModSkillDmgTaken(SkillUseTypes skill_num, int value);
 	int16 GetModSkillDmgTaken(const SkillUseTypes skill_num);

zone/spell_effects.cpp

@@ -3322,9 +3322,23 @@ void Mob::DoBuffTic(uint16 spell_id, int slot, uint32 ticsremaining, uint8 caste
 			}
 
 			case SE_Root: {
-				float SpellEffectiveness = ResistSpell(spells[spell_id].resisttype, spell_id, caster);
+				
-				if(SpellEffectiveness < 25) {
+				/* Root formula derived from extensive personal live parses - Kayen
-					BuffFadeByEffect(SE_Root);
+				ROOT has a 40% chance to do a resist check to break.
+				Resist check has NO LOWER bounds.
+				If multiple roots on target. Root in first slot will be checked first to break from nukes.
+				If multiple roots on target and broken by spell. Roots are removed ONE at a time in order of buff slot.
+				*/
+
+				if (MakeRandomInt(0, 99) < RuleI(Spells, RootBreakCheckChance)){
+				
+					float resist_check = ResistSpell(spells[spell_id].resisttype, spell_id, caster);
+
+					if(resist_check == 100) 
+						break;
+					else
+						if(!TryFadeEffect(slot))
+							BuffFadeBySlot(slot);
 				}
 
 				break;